
It’s creating new mental health challenges, making existing conditions worse, and leaving people with pre-existing mental health conditions even more vulnerable. The support systems that keep communities strong and resilient are being worn down by environmental degradation and more frequent extreme weather. Events like hurricanes, floods, and wildfires disrupt lives—forcing people from their homes, destroying livelihoods, and making food and water harder to come by.
The emotional impact of these crises can be devastating, especially for those most at risk, including children. Children born in 2020 are expected to face up to seven times more extreme weather events than their grandparents did. This puts their safety, health, and future development in serious danger. UNICEF has classified the climate crisis as a child rights crisis, underscoring the gravity of the situation.
Yet, despite the growing need for action, mental health is still one of the most overlooked areas in climate policies. Only 3% of Nationally Determined Contributions and 5% of National Adaptation Plans address mental health. This gap exists even though key global agreements—like the COP28 Declaration on Climate and Health and the WHA77 resolution on health and climate change—highlight the importance of including mental health in climate action.
While more data is still needed, the evidence we already have is strong enough to demand immediate and comprehensive efforts to safeguard mental health and psychosocial wellbeing in the face of climate change.
Certain groups are particularly vulnerable to the mental health impacts of climate change. These may include people living in areas prone to natural hazards, low-income communities, indigenous populations, children and young people, and individuals already living with mental health challenges.
This is particularly true in low- and middle-income countries, despite the fact that such countries have historically emitted low levels of greenhouse gasses. Furthermore, indigenous people may be more likely to define well-being in terms of harmony with natural environments, which are significantly disrupted by climate change. They may also be more reliant on natural resources for their subsistence and livelihoods. As a result, they may be more strongly affected by the loss of even small amounts of land or wildlife or by other climate-related impacts.
It’s important to remember that vulnerability is not the same for everyone—it depends on the specific context a person is living in. Understanding who is vulnerable and in what way requires careful assessment of unique circumstances. No single factor, like age or socioeconomic status, automatically makes someone vulnerable, but when multiple challenges overlap, the risks increase.
For example, an older adult, someone with lower income, a person living in a drought-prone area, or someone with a chronic illness may face challenges. But when someone faces several of these factors at the same time, the impact is much greater. Vulnerability is shaped by a combination of factors, not just one, and understanding these layers helps us better support those at higher risk.
Children and adolescents are especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change due to their developing bodies and minds, as well as their reliance on caregivers, which make them more susceptible to environmental hazards like extreme heat, air pollution, and water contamination. Despite this, not one of the 160 existing national adaptation policies across the world include considerations around children’s mental health (as of July 2024).
Psychologically, children and adolescents may struggle to cope with the stress and uncertainty caused by climate-related disasters or the perceived inaction of adults. For children already living with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities, these challenges can be even greater, putting them at heightened risk of worsening symptoms. There is growing consciousness and distress among young people over the prospect of living in a world of rising temperatures and climate unpredictability. Exposure to extreme weather events can expose young people to significantly stressful experiences that harm their physical health and community wellbeing.
Additionally, children’s limited understanding of environmental hazards and their potential consequences, and adolescents’ higher likelihood of taking risks, can lead to unintended prolonged exposure to hazards, further compromising their health.
Climate change has also been shown to have a major impact on workers across many sectors, including those working under extreme heat conditions outdoors, or in indoor workplaces without adequate cooling. A report by the International Labor Organisation highlighted how climate change poses health risks for 70% of the world’s workforce, including risks to mental health.
In recent years, there has been increased recognition of the connection between climate change and mental health. However, despite this growing interest, mental health still tends to be overshadowed by other health concerns. For instance, only 5% of climate and health studies in Europe focus on mental health, compared to 31% on infectious diseases. Yet, the World Health Organization emphasizes that there is already enough evidence on the relationship between climate change and mental health to justify immediate action.
To address these knowledge gaps, we need to broaden the scope of research on climate and mental health. This means going beyond studying only the direct effects of climate change to also exploring factors that increase vulnerability and resilience, the mechanisms through which climate change impacts mental health, what mental health interventions are appropriate in the context of a changing climate, as well as what are the mental health co-benefits coming from climate action.
It’s important to examine how climate change impacts different communities and to use culturally relevant research methods. Engaging communities directly in research, studying health systems and policies, and focusing on practical applications of this knowledge are all critical steps.
Efforts are also underway to explore how individuals and communities can manage the mental health impacts of climate change. Although coping strategies are being implemented worldwide, many have yet to be systematically evaluated in the context of climate change. More research is needed to understand their effectiveness and to refine approaches that can truly support individuals and communities facing climate-related mental health challenges.
It’s important to support individuals and communities to manage the mental health impacts of climate change. These strategies operate across different levels—from personal resilience to broader systemic changes.
In the face of climate-related disasters, protecting children’s access to education, healthcare, and a stable environment is crucial. By addressing the specific needs of young people, we can better safeguard their mental and physical well-being, ensuring they are equipped to face the challenges of a changing world.
Supporting climate advocates and activists is also important, as their work can take a toll on their own mental well-being. Ensuring they have access to support systems is key to sustaining their efforts in addressing the climate crisis.
The connection between climate change, the environment, and mental health is complex, demanding a big-picture, systems approach. Advocating for policies that both mitigate climate change and protect mental health is vital.
Mental health needs to be integrated into major climate policy frameworks like Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), and heat action plans. It should also be included in climate and health financing discussions, such as the Loss & Damage Fund, and be a focus at global events like the UN Climate Change Conferences.
Incorporating mental health into climate adaptation and mitigation strategies is essential and has co-benefits. For example, incorporating mental health into disaster risk reduction plans not only improves mental health outcomes, but also enhances disaster preparedness. Early warning systems that include mental health considerations can strengthen preparedness for climate-related events.
On the mitigation side, actions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions—such as promoting active transportation, energy-efficient housing, and sustainable diets—can positively impact mental health, creating a win-win situation for both people and the planet.
Collaboration between sectors including education, health, social protection, and environmental agencies can create a more holistic approach to addressing mental health in the context of climate change. Vulnerable populations, in particular, need targeted support.
EVENT
EVENT
Emma Ferguson (UNICEF)
Malvikha Manoj (UNICEF)
Swathi Manchikanti (UNICEF)
Alessandro Massazza (Wellcome)
Timo Partonen (Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare)
Reija Ruuhela (Finnish Meteorological Institute)
Maddie West (WMO-WHO Joint Office for Climate and Health)